{"id":18893,"date":"2024-05-17T14:12:29","date_gmt":"2024-05-17T14:12:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/artjournalstg.wpenginepowered.com\/?p=18893"},"modified":"2024-05-22T18:51:49","modified_gmt":"2024-05-22T18:51:49","slug":"robert-blanchon-aids-and-the-question-of-conceptualism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/?p=18893","title":{"rendered":"Robert Blanchon: AIDS and the Question of Conceptualism"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For his 1974 series&nbsp;<em>Men<\/em>, James Welling arranged some of modernism\u2019s most celebrated artists into a sequence of pas de deux. Each work contains two images of its titular artists in their studios, montaged to showcase the strikingly similar ways they perform their role.&nbsp;<em>Rothko\/Giacometti<\/em>&nbsp;shows both men on a break, smoking cigarettes as if to deflate the existential demands of making artwork;&nbsp;<em>Pollock\/Serra<\/em>&nbsp;shows these artists in the midst of painting, their active physical engagement seeming to shore up the expressive mark\u2019s authorial index. As isolated images these photographs might inspire a sense of high drama; however, by placing these \u201cdances of embattled subjectivity\u201d alongside each other, Welling pokes fun at artists who rehearse the set of romanticized tropes about the creative process and become, in the words of Douglas Eklund, \u201cprepackaged personae ready for consumption.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-1' id='fnref-18893-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>1<\/a><\/sup> Coming seventeen years later, the 1991 work&nbsp;<em>Untitled [Schnabel]<\/em>&nbsp;by Robert Blanchon (1965\u20131999) finds a similarly parodic pitch. Using a found image of the artist, Blanchon shows Julian Schnabel dressed like a prep school dropout, his loafers and wristwatch clashing with what appears to be a pair of striped pajamas and black sunglasses. Hunched over in a chair, gesturing at his audience with an air of jocular self-assurance, the image catches Schnabel in the midst of performing his own distinct artistic personality, one that substitutes the doom and gloom of Welling\u2019s diptychs with a combination of \u201chero and buffoon.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-2' id='fnref-18893-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>2<\/a><\/sup> While the photograph captures Schnabel\u2019s carefully crafted persona, Blanchon complicates his representation of the painter with a caption included below the photograph: \u201cHas Magic Johnson replaced Julian Schnabel? Happy Hunting. I love you from Robert Blanchon.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With his question, Blanchon produces a rather puzzling equivalence between the notorious Neo-Expressionist painter and one of the NBA\u2019s most famous athletes. Both men were wealthy and celebrated within their respective circles; however, Blanchon\u2019s caption suggests that a recent turn of events had structured their relationship to one another. Considering the work\u2019s creation in December 1991, Blanchon\u2019s association between Schnabel and Johnson seems to rest on the latter\u2019s HIV diagnosis, which he had revealed to the world just a month before. In fact, this image of Schnabel bears a certain resemblance to Johnson\u2019s posture during the press conference in which the latter revealed his positive status, speaking in front of a flock of reporters.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-3' id='fnref-18893-3' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>3<\/a><\/sup> The question remains, however, of what more specifically likens Johnson to Schnabel and what made his confession, or its reception among AIDS activists, similar to Schnabel\u2019s work and the Neo-Expressionist current in contemporary painting he represented. By parsing this complicated ecology bridging aesthetic and sociopolitical domains, it becomes clear that the rise of 1980s Neo-Expressionist painters like Schnabel was pitted against more critically engaged practices\u2014namely those of photo-based Conceptualist artists such as Sherrie Levine and other \u201cPictures Generation\u201d artists\u2014according to antagonisms that also distanced celebrities like Johnson from activist organizations including ACT UP (AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power), the Lesbian Avengers, Queer Nation, Gay Men\u2019s Health Crisis, or Sex Panic!.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-4' id='fnref-18893-4' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>4<\/a><\/sup> While Blanchon was a member of ACT UP, acting as an institutional liaison at the New Museum during his time in New York City, his work nevertheless complicates the sharp divide carved out between deconstructive, politicized analysis focused on structural aspects of the AIDS epidemic and more individualized reactions to its disastrous effects.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-5' id='fnref-18893-5' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>5<\/a><\/sup>: The Work of Robert Blanchon<\/em>, ed. Sasha Archibald (New York: Visual AIDS, 2009), 4.] Specifically, his discursive approach to sexuality and desire serves as a case study of how the supposedly solipsistic arena of subjectivity might have reentered AIDS discourse and activist art through a formal language that maintained the depersonalized edge of Conceptualism\u2019s \u201caesthetic of administration.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-6' id='fnref-18893-6' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>6<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery aligncenter columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"391\" height=\"500\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0001_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"18899\" data-full-url=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0001_c.jpg\" data-link=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/?attachment_id=18899\" class=\"wp-image-18899\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0001_c.jpg 391w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0001_c-156x200.jpg 156w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 391px) 100vw, 391px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">James Welling, Rothko\/Giacometti, 1974, photo offset print, 11 x 8\u00bd in. (27.9 x 21.6\u2009cm) (photograph \u00a9 James Welling; provided by the artist and David Zwirner)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"364\" height=\"500\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0002_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"18900\" data-full-url=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0002_c.jpg\" data-link=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/?attachment_id=18900\" class=\"wp-image-18900\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0002_c.jpg 364w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0002_c-146x200.jpg 146w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 364px) 100vw, 364px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">Robert Blanchon, Untitled [Schnabel], 1991, paper Xerox, 11 x 8\u00bd in. (27.9 x 21.6\u2009cm) (artwork \u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Johnson\u2019s confession was shocking\u2014as was Rock Hudson\u2019s confirmation of his status in 1985\u2014for demonstrating the virus\u2019s ability to reach the rich and famous. Even so, he was certainly not a typical patient. Due to his celebrity, Johnson joined Ryan White and Arthur Ashe\u2014both of whom acquired HIV through blood transfusions\u2014as exceptional cases whose diagnoses were eventually met with sympathy (although even these public personalities were of course not free from homophobic, paranoid forms of social exclusion). Indeed, Johnson\u2019s confession expedited a host of long-fought activist battles \u201cas if by magic.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-7' id='fnref-18893-7' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>7<\/a><\/sup> The media finally distinguished between HIV, which Johnson had contracted, and AIDS; it showed him living a relatively happy and productive life\u2014even framing him as Superman-like figure on a February 1996 cover of&nbsp;<em>Newsweek<\/em>\u2014that stood in sharp contrast to the prevailing spectacle of half-dead victims in hospital beds that dominated media outlets; George Bush Sr., in conversation with Johnson, even admitted that his administration\u2019s response to AIDS had been insufficient.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-8' id='fnref-18893-8' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>8<\/a><\/sup> This relatively supportive response to Johnson validated the approach adopted by one branch of AIDS advocates, who believed that if the disease could be seen and embodied through specific figureheads, it could be stopped. This view, what Douglas Crimp called the \u201ctypical liberal position,\u201d sought to provide the disease a series of strategically selected martyrs who elicited pity through their celebrity and individuated tales of grief and suffering.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-9' id='fnref-18893-9' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>9<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Within this schema prioritizing visibility and recognition, photography became a primary strategy for advertising the disease\u2019s deleterious effects. As Crimp pointed out, Rosalind Fox Solomon and Nicholas Nixon were especially important examples of this effort. Both artists produced portrait photographs that document the virus\u2019s attack on the body\u2014with special focus on patients\u2019 Kaposi sarcoma lesions and harrowing weight loss\u2014as well as its victims\u2019 social isolation. As quoted in Crimp\u2019s discussion of this genre of AIDS photography, curator Thomas Sokolowski identified the importance of artists like Fox Solomon in her visualization of the disease: \u201c\u2018Our awareness of [AIDS] grew through the accumulation of vast amounts of numerically derived evidence. . . . We could count it, but not truly describe it. Our picture of AIDS was a totally conceptual one.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-10' id='fnref-18893-10' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>10<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;In contrast to \u201cconceptual\u201d pictures of the epidemic, Fox Solomon and Nixon opted for sentimental evocations of loss that zero in on individual bodies as the virus\u2019s embattled nexus. In the eyes of certain figures in ACT UP, however, the poignancy of these photographs depended upon positioning their depicted subjects as little more than readymade vessels of tragic pathos, resulting in images where, Crimp argued, \u201cpeople\u2019s difficult personal circumstances have been exploited for public spectacle, their most private thoughts and emotions exposed.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-11' id='fnref-18893-11' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>11<\/a><\/sup> One might say, where statistics were dry and conceptual, Fox Solomon\u2019s and Nixon\u2019s images were designed to be&nbsp;<em>expressive<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"399\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0003_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18901\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0003_c.jpg 500w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0003_c-200x160.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption>Nicholas Nixon, Tony Mastrorilli, Mansfield, Massachusetts, 1988, gelatin silver print, 7\u00be x 9\u215d in. (19.7 x 24.5\u2009cm) (image courtesy Fraenkel Gallery, San Francisco \u00a9 Nicholas Nixon)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Zooming out from a focus on individual suffering, ACT UP members focused their messaging on structural issues related to income, access to health care, and representations of the virus in mass media. In turn, the focus on Johnson and other individual spokespeople was understood as a distraction from the \u201cpolitics of AIDS.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-12' id='fnref-18893-12' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>12<\/a><\/sup> At the Museum of Modern Art\u2019s 1988 exhibition&nbsp;<em>Pictures of People<\/em>, featuring Nixon\u2019s&nbsp;<em>People with AIDS<\/em>&nbsp;series, ACT UP distributed fliers that began and ended with the following demands: \u201cNO MORE PICTURES WITHOUT CONTEXT\u201d and \u201cSTOP LOOKING AT US; START LISTENING TO US,\u201d respectively. Their commands suggest a disinvestment in the visual as the primary domain of political action and, in particular, a call for activist campaigns that center PWAs (People with AIDS) as privileged voices in forging resistance over those who merely represent their decaying bodies as passive cenotaphs for the virus\u2019s destruction. This approach to the epidemic motivated artists to make work in which aesthetic function was circumscribed within the rhetoric of activist engagement. Criticality appeared to come with an evacuation of sentiment, resulting in work whose effect was declarative rather than evocative, impersonal rather than idiosyncratic. The logo of the SILENCE\u2009=\u2009DEATH Project, which ACT UP was allowed to use throughout its activism and became associated with the organization, epitomizes this distinction.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-13' id='fnref-18893-13' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>13<\/a><\/sup> In addition to its matter-of-fact formulation\u2014the embrace of mathematical symbols being a clear demonstration of the organization\u2019s analytic accent\u2014the slogan also circulated outside the fine-art ecosystem. Pasted on T-shirts and printed on buttons, fliers, and protest signs, it materializes Crimp\u2019s assertion\u2014published in&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>\u2019s Winter 1987 issue focused on the epidemic\u2014that activist art \u201cinvolves questions not only of the nature of cultural production, but also of the location, or the means of distribution, of that production.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-14' id='fnref-18893-14' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>14<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Of primary importance to AIDS activist organizations, intimated in this last quotation, is an interrogation of representational processes, of how the disease became a visual and textual discourse. In this regard, video was particularly relevant for activists because it allowed them to re-script the very medium in which information about the virus was most readily distributed. As artist and AIDS activist Gregg Bordowitz wrote in the same issue of&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>, \u201cwe must call into question the established structures of the media. We must create new ways to make and distribute media. We must work toward participatory forms of representation that incorporate people into the communication process.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-15' id='fnref-18893-15' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>15<\/a><\/sup> The 1987 series&nbsp;<em>Only Human: Sex, Gender, and Other Misrepresentations<\/em>, organized by B. Ruby Rich and Bill Horrigan, exemplified this medium-specific revision. As Crimp describes,&nbsp;<em>Only Human<\/em>&nbsp;was included in the 1987 American Film Institute Video Festival and featured twenty videos concerning AIDS, ranging from educational material (<em>Sex, Drugs, and AIDS<\/em>, made for the New York City school system) to critiques of AIDS media (<em>A Plague on You<\/em>, made by the Lesbian and Gay Media Group), to tapes made for broadcast television (<em>AIDS in the Arts<\/em>).<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-16' id='fnref-18893-16' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>16<\/a><\/sup> Produced by a coalition of activists, rather than individual authors,&nbsp;<em>Only Huma<\/em>n reconfigured the direction of AIDS representation, shifting away from an exogeneous\u2014albeit sympathetic\u2014voyeur to visual material made in-house, produced as part of a comprehensive activist engagement that transcended the official confines of the art world. Furthermore, whereas the news cycle presented the virus itself through medical telescopes as, \u201ca huge technicolor asteroid,\u201d on the one hand, and the bodies it infects and kills, on the other\u2014a haunting diptych that Simon Watney called the \u201cspectacle of AIDS\u201d\u2014<em>Only Human<\/em>&nbsp;illuminated the activity of grassroots activists who were combatting the virus and institutional lethargy, utilizing television and video primarily as informational platforms rather than aesthetic media.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-17' id='fnref-18893-17' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>17<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To repeat our earlier question, what does this tension between grassroots AIDS activism and photographers like Nixon and Fox Solomon have to do with Schnabel? The answer lies in a roughly coterminous divide emerging in the art world between the Pictures Generation and Neo-Expressionism\u2014a parallel in which Crimp played a major part through his activism as well as his written and curatorial work that helped establish the former group as a distinct set of artists. Blanchon was certainly aware of this dynamic, both as an artist active throughout the 1980s and as a professor of art history teaching courses on contemporary art.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-18' id='fnref-18893-18' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>18<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Indeed, Fiona Johnstone recently revealed (in the most extensive treatment of the artist\u2019s work to date) that during a course at the University of California, Irvine, in the spring term of 1997, Blanchon assigned Levine\u2019s text \u201cFive Comments,\u201d which focuses on the postmodern critique of originality and authorship.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-19' id='fnref-18893-19' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>19<\/a><\/sup> This aesthetic cleavage was most actively asserted by the critics associated with&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>. These writers went beyond strictly aesthetic analyses to assign ideological value to the various formal differences between the primarily photo- and video-based Pictures Generation and Neo-Expressionist painters. The former\u2019s use of appropriation and montage was understood as a deconstruction of cultural topoi, a means of uncovering \u201cstrata of representation\u201d beneath otherwise transparent imagery.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-20' id='fnref-18893-20' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>20<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;In turn, artists such as Levine and Cindy Sherman were championed by critics including Crimp and Benjamin H. D. Buchloh as the successors to Hans Haacke, Michael Asher, Marcel Broodthaers, and their peers working in the 1960s and 1970s, who similarly questioned the systems undergirding the production and display of artwork, namely the museum. The genealogy those critics constructed reflects an evaluative metric in which, as Buchloch wrote, \u201cit is in the critical analysis of the actual procedures and materials of production and reception that a work\u2019s historical legitimacy will be evident.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-21' id='fnref-18893-21' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>21<\/a><\/sup> Crimp would write in strikingly similar terms regarding the discourse on AIDS: \u201cwe must also recognize that every image of a PWA is a&nbsp;<em>representation<\/em>, and formulate our activist demands not in relation to the \u2018truth\u2019 of the image, but in relation to the conditions of its construction and to its social effects.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-22' id='fnref-18893-22' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>22<\/a><\/sup> As with the construction of femininity for an artist like Sherman, then, in the views of Crimp and other activists working in response to the misrepresentation of the epidemic, AIDS was a Pictures problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On the opposite end of the spectrum, photographers such as Nixon and Neo-Expressionist painters were aggressively admonished according to similar points of contention. In the 1980s, \u201cNeo-Expressionism\u201d proved to be a pejorative dismissal as much as an aesthetic descriptor, positioned as the capitalist foil to the Picture Generation\u2019s critique of art\u2019s commodification. For Levine\u2019s&nbsp;<em>After Walker Evans: 4<\/em>&nbsp;(1981), for instance, the artist photographed a reproduction of Evans\u2019s famous portrait&nbsp;<em>Alabama Tenant Farmer Wife<\/em>&nbsp;(1936). By removing any sign of her own intervention, Buchloh argued that Levine\u2019s work \u201cthreatens within its very structure, mode of operation, and status the current reaffirmation of individual expressive creativity and its implicit reaffirmation of private property and enterprise.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-23' id='fnref-18893-23' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>23<\/a><\/sup> Moreover, he argued that Levine resuscitated the work\u2019s \u201creader\/viewer\u201d as an active participant in the work\u2019s signification, charged with tracking its syntactical construction of appropriated elements and their break from a now nullified authorial subject.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-24' id='fnref-18893-24' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>24<\/a><\/sup> Crimp and Buchloh contended that Neo-Expressionist painters, in contrast, asserted themselves and their biography as the work\u2019s primary epistemological determination, a flattened framework more easily subject to settlement, fixation, and commodification. Buchloh would even relate Neo-Expressionism\u2019s \u201cideology of individual expression\u201d to a \u201cproto-Fascist libertarianism.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-25' id='fnref-18893-25' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>25<\/a><\/sup> While Nixon\u2019s and Fox Solomon\u2019s photographs present individual narratives of patients\u2019 suffering, not their own, the efficacy of their work nevertheless depends on unique voices cut off from the collective, each patient configured as an expressive cipher. Furthermore, rather than producing the postmodern \u201creader\/viewer\u201d who is interpolated into the aesthetic experience through their deciphering of an unmoored array of fragmentary materials, their photographs are inert, merely \u201creiteration[s] of what we have already been told or shown about people with AIDS: that they are ravaged, disfigured, and debilitated by the syndrome; they are generally alone, desperate, but resigned to their \u2018inevitable\u2019 deaths.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-26' id='fnref-18893-26' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>26<\/a><\/sup> Trafficking in stereotype, these photographs are designed to speak for themselves without the intervention of the viewer. AIDS activists like Crimp as well as critics like Buchloh were resistant to this faith in authorial intent and the idea of self-evident meaning, opting instead for art practices that interrogated representation itself as a nexus of ideological control and, in turn, political intervention.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-27' id='fnref-18893-27' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>27<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"408\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0004_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18902\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0004_c.jpg 500w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0004_c-200x163.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption>Robert Blanchon, Untitled [sympathy card], ca. 1994, black-and-white photograph, wood frame, 31 x 34 in. (78.7 x 86.4\u2009cm) (image courtesy Visual AIDS, New York City \u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The connection that Blanchon articulated between Johnson and Schnabel consequently seems to emerge from their shared primacy within a \u201cliberal\u201d belief in representation, one in which representation operates as a sufficient vehicle of political intervention. Within this complicated discourse spanning aesthetics and activism, Blanchon would have likely aligned himself with writers like Buchloh and Crimp. As the artist wrote in 1993, \u201clike all attempts to personalize the plague, the Magic Johnsons of the world are unlikely to change the destination of those sick for reasons of simple economic exclusion and social expulsion.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-28' id='fnref-18893-28' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>28<\/a><\/sup>,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Robert Blanchon<\/em>, ed. Duvergne and Sadao, 113.] Johnstone notes Blanchon\u2019s critical approach to representation in relation to his consistent return to self-effacement, naming absence as \u201ca hallmark even of Blanchon\u2019s most autobiographical works,\u201d which \u201ccan be read as part of a deliberate strategy to foreground the role of the viewer in meaning making.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-29' id='fnref-18893-29' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>29<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Furthermore, much of his work aligns with ACT UP\u2019s emphasis on depersonalized analysis of the epidemic over anecdotal stories of loss and heartbreak. Take&nbsp;<em>Untitled [sympathy card]<\/em>, for example. Here, the traditional means of thanking friends and family for their condolences, a distinctly intimate and personal affair, is uncharacteristically abstracted. Blanchon included a blank line where the bereaved family name would ordinarily appear, suggesting that AIDS inflicts a generalized, diffuse trauma above and beyond individual ruination. With this work, as Sasha Archibald writes, Blanchon identifies the necessity of extrapolation in mourning AIDS, of producing a political rhetoric wherein a \u201csingle vacancy turns monumental.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-30' id='fnref-18893-30' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>30<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"386\" height=\"500\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0005_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18903\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0005_c.jpg 386w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0005_c-154x200.jpg 154w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 386px) 100vw, 386px\" \/><figcaption>Robert Blanchon, Untitled [I will not get AIDS], ca. 1989, multiple: sticker, 9\u00bd x 7\u00bd in. (24.1 x 19.1\u2009cm) (artwork \u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Additionally, with&nbsp;<em>Untitled [I will not get AIDS]<\/em>, Blanchon collaged together the work\u2019s parenthetical title, the slogan of a 1989 AIDS awareness campaign in Chicago (where the artist was then studying at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and where he received his diagnosis), an additional line of red text reading \u201cACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS\u201d and an image of Mayor Robert Daley.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-31' id='fnref-18893-31' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>31<\/a><\/sup> As in the work of Barbara Kruger, another Pictures Generation artist, the text \u201cmanifest[s] the subject positions of partners in a conversation.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-32' id='fnref-18893-32' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>32<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;By specifying Daley as the \u201cI\u201d who will not get AIDS, Blanchon suggested that viewers of the work, the implied \u201cYou,\u201d remain an unprotected class vulnerable to transmission, unable to predict their future status as confidently as those in positions of power. Chicago\u2019s campaign was heavily criticized by AIDS activists because its visual implements\u2014billboards and posters\u2014did not provide any information describing&nbsp;<em>how<\/em>&nbsp;people were supposed to avoid contracting the virus, suggesting instead that the blind optimism of its slogan would suffice.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-33' id='fnref-18893-33' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>33<\/a><\/sup> The red text toward the bottom of Blanchon\u2019s work, however, also interjects into this life-threatening obfuscation, reminding Daley\u2019s administration and viewers of the posters in Chicago that, regardless of the slogan, the city\u2019s response to the epidemic must become material. The shortcomings of Daley\u2019s campaign appear to be symptomatic of the 1987 Helms Amendment, which \u201cprohibit[ed] the federal funding of any healthcare information that might \u2018promote, encourage, or condone homosexual sexual activities or the intravenous use of illegal drugs,\u2019\u201d effectively censoring safe-sex instruction from AIDS educational material.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-34' id='fnref-18893-34' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>34<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Keeping this in mind<em>, Untitled [I will not get AIDS]<\/em>&nbsp;names Daley as one identifiable node within the sweeping resistance to the dissemination of information about HIV\/AIDS. By pasting his sticker around the streets of Chicago, Blanchon expanded his use of personal pronouns, pitting the singular \u201cI\u201d against an accumulatively identified \u201cYou\u201d\u2014one that bypassed himself or any one individual to identify the city at large as the collective victim of Daley\u2019s informational gatekeeping.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-35' id='fnref-18893-35' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>35<\/a><\/sup> In this sense, his work can be compared to Donald Moffett\u2019s 1987 indictment of Ronald Reagan in&nbsp;<em>He Kills Me<\/em>, where the artist uses a personal pronoun, \u201cMe,\u201d to identify how governmental resistance to HIV\/AIDS prevention trickles down to touch individual lives. \u201cMe\u201d functions as a poignant personalization of Reagan\u2019s abandonment of AIDS patients, which, like Daley\u2019s, was forged through pernicious, deadly forms of inaction. Sociologist Josh Gamson wrote the same year that Blanchon made his poster that \u201cACT UP members often have trouble finding their \u2018enemies.\u2019\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-36' id='fnref-18893-36' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>36<\/a><\/sup> By naming and picturing Daley and Reagan as two such enemies, Blanchon and Moffett intervened in this political battleground by creating dialogues that, through posing their unnamed, generalized viewer against a fixed point of opposition, simultaneously attempted to \u201cpicture a coalition.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-37' id='fnref-18893-37' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>37<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"331\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0006_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18904\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0006_c.jpg 500w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0006_c-200x132.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption>Donald Moffett, He Kills Me, 1987, offset lithograph, 23\u00bd x 37\u00bd in. (59.7 x 95.3\u2009cm) (artwork \u00a9 Donald Moffett; image provided by the Museum of Modern Art, New York, Licensed by SCALA\/Art Resource, NY)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While Blanchon\u2019s work shares an affinity with that of the Pictures Generation, he is consistently called a Conceptual artist. Indeed, the introductory remarks to both of Blanchon\u2019s only two catalogs use the term to describe his work\u2019s overarching aesthetic and lineage.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-38' id='fnref-18893-38' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>38<\/a><\/sup><\/em>. See notes 3 and 5.] If Levine and other Pictures Generation artists certainly figure in a history of Conceptualism, the label given to Blanchon most readily calls to mind a slightly earlier group of artists emerging in the late 1960s across the world who aimed to bypass the authorial claims and material emphasis of art commodities through routinized procedures and text-based practices.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-39' id='fnref-18893-39' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>39<\/a><\/sup> Formally, this comparison holds up.&nbsp;<em>Untitled [Schnabel]<\/em>&nbsp;could easily be compared to John Baldessari\u2019s photo-text paintings from the late 1960s while&nbsp;<em>Untitled [sympathy card]<\/em>&nbsp;resembles any number of dematerialized, Conceptual works from the same period. In his various forms of self-effacement, Blanchon also gestured toward an alignment with Conceptual artists\u2014or \u201cclerks,\u201d as Sol LeWitt called himself and his peers\u2014who \u201cadopted predetermined schemas in order to ensure that subjectivity and personal expression would play virtually no role in artistic production.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-40' id='fnref-18893-40' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>40<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Eliminating individual expression by engaging the rote mechanics of office work, Conceptual artists, at various levels of intensity, aimed to debunk the myth of the artist-hero parodically staged by Welling. Here we see the important similarities shared by Conceptual art as it emerged in the 1960s and the Pictures Generation formally announced a decade later. Both attempted to overturn the traditional model of aesthetic experience dependent on transcendent artistic objects and the privileged position of the author for a more level playing field between art and its reader\/viewers. If Blanchon\u2019s work exhibits an affinity for these modes of critical analysis, however, it does not merely mirror them or aspire toward their totalizing rejection of individual subjecthood and expressivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With&nbsp;<em>Conceptualism\u2019s Anniversary<\/em>, for instance, Blanchon set up a fake conference to be held at the no longer extant Terra Museum of Art in Chicago, complete with a lecture on \u201cThe Semiotics Surrounding Recent Health Care Concerns\u201d by Susan Sontag and a panel investigating \u201cThe Ironies of Self-Reflexive Conceptualism\u201d led by Vito Acconci, Laurie Palmer, and Joseph Kosuth, among others.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-41' id='fnref-18893-41' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>41<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Invitations were sent and invited guests showed up to the museum on the day of the conference, only to be turned away at the door. Critic and professor James Yood attested to the effectiveness of the work\u2019s institutional drag: \u201che got me on that one, and the embarrassment\/exhilaration of being so artfully and aptly tricked was unforgettable.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-42' id='fnref-18893-42' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>42<\/a><\/sup> Blanchon even submitted an article to&nbsp;<em>Whitewalls<\/em>&nbsp;covering the event under the pseudonym Dolores Boogdanian, rounding out the conference\u2019s fictionalized life cycle.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-43' id='fnref-18893-43' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>43<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Here, Blanchon pointed to a particular moment of Conceptual art\u2019s assimilation\u2014its art historical canonization\u2014set within the style\u2019s more structural integration into postwar society. Alexander Alberro argues via Jean Baudrillard\u2019s theory of the \u201cXerox degree of culture\u201d that as Conceptual art increasingly began to resemble the text-based practices of publicity and telecommunications, \u201cthe sphere of art expanded, becoming coterminous with market society in such a way that the aesthetic was no longer limited to its earlier, traditional or experimental forms but was consumed throughout daily life itself.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-44' id='fnref-18893-44' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>44<\/a><\/sup> Announcing Conceptualism\u2019s anniversary accented this transformation of an avant-garde rupture into an institutional staple, an assimilation into the realm of fine art and capitalism that Conceptual artists had previously worked to avoid, and consequently articulated an ambivalence toward that earlier group rather than blind admiration. Similarly, in the late 1980s Blanchon began stamping \u201cBiceps\u201d in red text over exhibition announcements for a coterie of high-profile Conceptual and Minimalist artists including LeWitt and Donald Judd, mocking their heady intellectualism and massive sculptures as pathological assertions of patriarchal masculinity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Blanchon\u2019s fatigue with these artists\u2019 self-serious machismo is echoed in other works where he reinserted subjective expression into the formal language of Conceptual art, breaking down the supposedly intractable barriers between critical, postmodern analysis and the registration of individual experience. That this breakdown occurred in the context of Blanchon\u2019s grappling with the AIDS epidemic and its concomitant effects on queer sexuality points to the epidemic\u2019s substantive impact on the period\u2019s aesthetic debates. Indeed, as Crimp claimed, it was precisely the rupture caused by&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>\u2019s special issue on AIDS and a subsequent isssue planned on representations of gays and lesbians in the media that led to his break with the journal, illustrating a tension between its relatively formalist politics and the activist\u2019s gradual turn toward cultural studies, sparked by the exigencies of the epidemic.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-45' id='fnref-18893-45' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>45<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Hal Foster replaced Crimp as editor of the journal in 1991\u2014alongside Buchloh, Yves-Alain Bois, Denis Hollier, and John Rajchman\u2014but has since confirmed the importance of AIDS in understanding art from the 1980s and 1990s. In a recent interview in which Foster reflects on the period in question, he notes, \u201cIt was really AIDS that drove the politicization of art during that time. It was one factor that shifted the focus away from \u2018pictures\u2019 and \u2018texts\u2019\u2014pictures as texts\u2014to bodies, bodies in pain, bodies in a plague, to a body politic that was diseased as well\u2026. Everything before seemed to be \u2018image\u2019 and \u2018sign,\u2019 but then there was a \u2018return of the real.\u2019\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-46' id='fnref-18893-46' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>46<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here, therefore, we might be able to better locate Blanchon\u2019s critical accent, one involved in an assessment of expression and representational circuits\u2014\u00e0 la Conceptual art and the Pictures Generation\u2014but unwilling to excise subjectivity tout court. Indeed, as Johnstone writes, \u201cBlanchon\u2019s work provides an important counterpoint to the activist graphics of the late 1980s\u201d as well as \u201cto the na\u00efve photographic practices of Nicholas Nixon and Rosalind Solomon.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-47' id='fnref-18893-47' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>47<\/a><\/sup> In fact, the works already considered exhibit this integration of affect and emotion into a Conceptualist frame highly skeptical of authorship. In&nbsp;<em>Conceptualism\u2019s Anniversary<\/em>, the artist\u2019s satirical celebration of Conceptualism\u2019s canonization denotes a wry sense of humor, even a juvenile prankishness. Alternatively, it is difficult to imagine&nbsp;<em>Untitled [I will not get AIDS]<\/em>, born as a form of agitprop, as uniformly depersonalized, affectively flat, and unmotivated. Rather, given the immediacy of the crisis, public responses like Blanchon\u2019s were not merely objective, conceptual, or semiotic interrogations of AIDS discourse but laden with anger and fear as well. Additionally, Blanchon consistently staged sexuality, or sexual&nbsp;<em>expression<\/em>, in his excavation of \u201cthe real.\u201d However, in place of individual libidos he approached desire as a discourse that can studied, analyzed, and tracked. For example, with&nbsp;<em>Untitled [If You Like a Man Who\u2019s 25]<\/em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Untitled [Bodyrub in Queens]<\/em>, among other examples from the same series, the artist sent out a cold call for models to pose for him. Blanchon then juxtaposed photographs of his volunteers with escort advertisements from the personal ads in local newspapers.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-48' id='fnref-18893-48' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>48<\/a><\/sup> At first glance, these works seem to present sex workers posed alongside their self-promotional material. When the photographed subjects are revealed for who they are\u2014anonymous pedestrians\u2014the images are at once stripped of an erotic energy specific to the person and invested with the more general, diffuse eroticism of mass-produced classifieds. Within this series, desirous expression primarily functions as a coefficient, augmenting and animating even the most banal imagery. It seems Blanchon was attempting to isolate the discursive&nbsp;<em>production<\/em>&nbsp;of desire in order to show how and where it operates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery aligncenter columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"436\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0007_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"18905\" data-full-url=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0007_c.jpg\" data-link=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/?attachment_id=18905\" class=\"wp-image-18905\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0007_c.jpg 500w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0007_c-200x174.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">Robert Blanchon, Conceptualism\u2019s Anniversary, 1989, invitation and envelope: letterpress; invitation: 5\u00be x 4\u00bd in. (14.6 x 11.4\u2009cm); envelope 4\u00be x 6\u00bd inches (12.1 x 16.5\u2009cm) (\u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"335\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0008_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"18906\" data-full-url=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0008_c.jpg\" data-link=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/?attachment_id=18906\" class=\"wp-image-18906\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0008_c.jpg 500w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0008_c-200x134.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">Robert Blanchon, Untitled [Donald Judd Biceps], ca. 1990, ink, paper, dims. unknown (\u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery aligncenter columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-3 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"403\" height=\"500\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0009_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"18907\" data-full-url=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0009_c.jpg\" data-link=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/?attachment_id=18907\" class=\"wp-image-18907\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0009_c.jpg 403w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0009_c-161x200.jpg 161w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 403px) 100vw, 403px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">Robert Blanchon, Untitled [If You Like a Man Who\u2019s 25], 1987, gelatin silver print, 20 x 16 in. (50.9 x 40.6\u2009cm) (photograph \u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"403\" height=\"500\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0010_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"18908\" data-full-url=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0010_c.jpg\" data-link=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/?attachment_id=18908\" class=\"wp-image-18908\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0010_c.jpg 403w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0010_c-161x200.jpg 161w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 403px) 100vw, 403px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">Robert Blanchon, Untitled [Bodyrub in Queens], 1987, gelatin silver print, 20 x 16 in. (50.9 x 4. 6\u2009cm) (photograph \u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Cruising New York<\/em>&nbsp;is another example of how Blanchon elevated the intimacy of sexual expression into an analytic project. In a magazine called&nbsp;<em>Promotional Copy<\/em>, Blanchon placed an invitation for readers to join him on a tour of various cruising sites around New York City: the West Side Piers, the Ramble in Central Park, and the bathrooms in Grand Central Station, among others. While&nbsp;<em>Conceptualism\u2019s Anniversary<\/em>&nbsp;was designed from the start as a fabulation, artist Mary Ellen Carroll\u2014a close friend of Blanchon and executor of his estate\u2014confirmed that&nbsp;<em>Cruising New York<\/em>&nbsp;was, at least in her case, more than mere provocation: \u201cI did the tour, and believe me, it was not fake. There were very real locations with very real activity going on.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-49' id='fnref-18893-49' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>49<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;The format of the magazine advertisement calls to mind Adrian Piper\u2019s advertisements for her series&nbsp;<em>The Mythic Being<\/em>&nbsp;placed in the&nbsp;<em>Village Voice<\/em>, as well as gallerist Seth Siegelaub\u2019s promotional strategies. As Alberro wrote of Siegelaub\u2019s advertisement for his 1968 exhibition of Douglas Huebler\u2019s work, which exhibits a rather mundane graphic design, \u201cthe manner in which Siegelaub presented the work of Huebler celebrated its insertion into the heterogeneous fabric of publicity, display, and information.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-50' id='fnref-18893-50' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>50<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;In Blanchon\u2019s hands, however, the \u201cwork\u201d in question is a presentation of the nameless, anonymous sex to be found in the various cruising grounds he promised to show his guests. Inserting cruising into the informational and distributive context of a magazine advertisement reinforced the artist\u2019s interest in the relatively dull contexts through which desire could be circulated and consumed. Furthermore, upon taking the tour, sexuality in its most carnal expression was retrofitted into and refracted through Blanchon\u2019s ascetic framing, positioned uncomfortably between organic activity and anthropological object of inquiry. Indeed, along with his bandana series\u2014 which displays individual, colored bandanas, each advertising their own kink or sexual proclivity within its subcultural lexicon\u2014<em>Cruising New York<\/em>&nbsp;\u201ctakes the information from an insider, privileged realm and drops it into the public like a meteor.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-51' id='fnref-18893-51' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>51<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;However, this publicity was not self-involved; rather, he attempted to reveal the ways in which desire functioned at scale\u2014shedding light on its clandestine geography, its communication, and its discursive proliferation. Following Foster\u2019s contention that artists emerging in the 1990s exhibited \u201can ambition to inhabit a place of total affect&nbsp;<em>and<\/em>&nbsp;to be drained of affect altogether,\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-52' id='fnref-18893-52' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>52<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;with the works described here Blanchon appears to have been interested in the way that something as charged as sexuality could be articulated through the lens of Conceptualism\u2019s dry, depersonalized idiom. Whether the viewer is confronted with a want ad or groups of men cruising, \u201cthe real\u201d is nevertheless mediated\u2014or conceptualized\u2014through its restrained presentation via newsprint or informational tour groups. For, even in this tour, sex itself was positioned at a remove, shuttled through and constructed by Blanchon\u2019s representational system. The inherently artificial quality of this \u201ccruising\u201d experience calls to mind what Blanchon\u2019s friend and fellow artist Connie Samaras wrote, after his death, about their shared artistic philosophies: \u201csome things and some art, we learned, must remain private, relegated to a dimension where the failure of language and the failure of vision becomes the intention.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-53' id='fnref-18893-53' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>53<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"364\" height=\"500\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0011_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18909\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0011_c.jpg 364w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0011_c-146x200.jpg 146w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 364px) 100vw, 364px\" \/><figcaption>Robert Blanchon, Cruising New York, 1993, multiple: paper, 28 x 21\u00bd in (71.1 x 54.6\u2009cm) (\u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Blanchon\u2019s work, however, entailed an ethical streak that extended beyond the confines of the aesthetic debate between Conceptual art and Neo-Expressionism described here. Because the specific desires Blanchon was interested in analyzing were distinctly queer, his works\u2019 expressive residue coincides with the insistence of AIDS activists on changing the terms of public morality. As Simon Watney wrote in 1987, instead of formulating a sexual politics around a unitary conception of \u201cgay oppression,\u201d it is the set of cultural conventions surrounding desire that should occupy AIDS activists since \u201cit is the structure, epistemology, and \u2018decorum\u2019 of \u2018sexuality\u2019 itself that have inexorably led us to the tragic impasse in which we find ourselves.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-54' id='fnref-18893-54' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>54<\/a><\/sup> Similarly, Crimp wrote that \u201calongside the dismal toll of death, what many of us have lost is a culture of sexual possibility,\u201d referring to sexual liberation in the 1970s before the epidemic took hold.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-55' id='fnref-18893-55' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>55<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;Interrogating wide-ranging attitudes toward sexuality, orienting activism toward a now vanished culture of libidinal freedom, both Watney and Crimp articulate the importance of desire to the bourgeoning discourse surrounding AIDS in the 1980s. Blanchon took this call to action seriously, abstracting desire from the idiosyncratic impulses of individuals and inserting it into distributive systems like a viral cocktail. The point is not that Blanchon stripped sexuality of its libidinal charge, nor that he attempted to assert the validity of queer desire through affirmative representations. Rather, in appropriating desire as a readymade material\u2014present as much in cruising\u2019s coded language as in anonymous want ads\u2014he was able to bridge the gap between critical analysis and individual expression in order to confront the \u201cstructure, epistemology, and \u2018decorum\u2019\u201d of sexuality identified by Watney.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"499\" src=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0012_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18910\" srcset=\"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0012_c.jpg 500w, http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/rcaj_a_2317689_uf0012_c-200x200.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption>Robert Blanchon, Untitled (s\/m top-bottom), 1995, gelatin silver print, wood frame, 40\u00bd x 40\u00bd in. (102.9 x 102.9\u2009cm) (photograph \u00a9 1999 The Estate of Robert Blanchon\u2014Mary Ellen Carroll\/MEC, Studios; provided by Visual AIDS, New York City)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Writing in regard to the constructed divisions that emerged between Conceptualism and Neo-Expressionism in the 1970s and 1980s described in these pages, Isabelle Graw stated that \u201cexpression can be conceptualized \u2026 just as works resulting from thorough conceptual planning can exhibit a sort of \u2018residual expression.\u2019\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-18893-56' id='fnref-18893-56' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(18893)'>56<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;If she provides a theoretical framework for identifying the artistic modes that fall in between Conceptualism and Neo-Expressionism, Blanchon\u2019s work points toward the AIDS epidemic as one of the many forces that prompted this slippage. In particular, his work concerning sexual expression responded to Watney\u2019s understanding that public attitudes toward desire were constitutive of the epidemic\u2019s ascendence. More broadly, however, Blanchon\u2019s practice was indicative of a certain hangover after deconstruction and the concomitant rise of art practices in the 1980s and \u201990s that engaged questions of the queer body and its politics with increasing candor. Blanchon subsequently acted as a prompt to reconsider the seemingly intractable divides between purportedly critical art and its Neo-Expressionist foil, between photographers like Nixon and the diagrammatic work made by artists associated with ACT UP, to make room for a framework that accounts for artists\u2019 porous movement between these analytic and emotive methodologies. Linking together figures like Schnabel and Johnson, Blanchon\u2019s work offers a remarkable picture of the mutually informing machinations structuring art and AIDS politics in the1980s, revealing the diffusion of debates concerning the rhetoric of expression that spanned postmodern aesthetics and the (ongoing) fight against the disease, reading one through the other in a perpetual exchange.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Blake Oetting is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University. His dissertation, \u201cThe New Aesthetics of Administration,\u201d examines the development of institutional critique practices in the 1980s and 1990s. In addition to&nbsp;<em>Art Journal<\/em>, his past and forthcoming writing can be found in&nbsp;<em>Nka<\/em>,&nbsp;<em>Criticism<\/em>,&nbsp;<em>Artforum<\/em>, and&nbsp;<em>Texte Zur Kunst<\/em>, among other publications and exhibition catalogs. [The Institute of Fine Arts, New York University, 1 E. 78th St., New York, NY 10075,&nbsp;<a href=\"mailto:bo608@nyu.edu\">bo608@nyu.edu<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thank you to Professor Thomas Crow for providing thoughts on an earlier version of this essay and to the peer reviewers for their subsequent insights and questions. Thank you also to Nicholas Martin at Fales Library, Kyle Croft at Visual AIDS and Mary Ellen Carroll for their assistance in sourcing materials. Finally, thank you to the artists and estates named throughout these pages for allowing me to reproduce images of their work in this essay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-18893'><div class='footnotedivider'><\/div><ol><li id='fn-18893-1'>Douglas Eklund,&nbsp;<em>The Pictures Generation, 1974\u20131984<\/em>&nbsp;(New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2009), 31. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-2'>Alison Pearlman,&nbsp;<em>Unpackaging Art of the 1980s<\/em>&nbsp;(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), 50. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-2'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-3'>In her chapter about Blanchon\u2019s practice, Fiona Johnstone notes that Blanchon would later, in 1996, discuss the symbolic role of Magic Johnson in rather different terms: \u201cWhenever Magic dies it won\u2019t matter. We are past the point of awareness and change. This DNA replicating virus is less talked about than Melrose Place or that really annoying show Friends.\u201d See her recent book,&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Representation: Queering Portraiture During the AIDS Crisis in America<\/em>&nbsp;(London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2023), 109. As for the date of Blanchon\u2019s work, the archival catalog in Visual AIDS\u2019s monograph on the artist notes it was \u201cmailed as a Christmas card,\u201d presumably sometime in December 1991. For the full chronology, see \u201cCatalogue of the Robert Blanchon Archive,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Robert Blanchon<\/em>, ed. Tania Duvergne and Amy Sadao (New York: Visual AIDS, 2006), 131\u201369. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-3'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-4'>The \u201cPictures Generation\u201d is a label given to artists like Levine who were included in the 1977 exhibition titled&nbsp;<em>Pictures<\/em>&nbsp;curated by Douglas Crimp at Artists Space. The other artists were Troy Brauntuch, Jack Goldstein, Robert Longo, and Philip Smith. Cindy Sherman would be included as part of this group in a subsequent essay written by Crimp about the exhibition; see his text \u201cPictures,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;8 (Spring 1979): 75\u201388. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-4'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-5'>Blanchon is cited as a spokesperson for the New Museum in an article discussing its condom distribution campaign \u201cLove for Sale\u2014Free Condoms Inside.\u201d See Linda Yablonskaya, \u201cOpening a Window on Truth in (Sex) Advertising,\u201d&nbsp;<em>Outweek<\/em>, March 27, 1991, 58. Regarding his relationship to ACT UP, close friend and executor of Blanchon\u2019s estate Mary Ellen Carroll says the following about the artist\u2019s activist involvement: \u201cYes, Robert participated in the AIDS activism group ACT UP. This was really when AIDS was at its height. The number of people who were dying in the community of visual artists, and all across the culture industry, was totally devastating. It was a poignant moment for many people in New York, and also an incredibly important time in terms of political activism and protest. Robert was a part of this movement in Chicago and continued to be part of it in New York.\u201d Quoted in Bethany Martin-Breen, \u201cInterview with Mary Ellen Carroll,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>You Make Me Feel [Mighty Real <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-5'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-6'>See Benjamin H. D. Buchloh, \u201cConceptual Art, 1962\u20131969: From the Aesthetic of Administration to the Critique of Institutions,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;55 (Winter 1990): 105\u201343. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-6'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-7'>Douglas Crimp, \u201cAccommodating Magic,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Melancholia and Moralism: Essays on AIDS and Queer Politics<\/em>&nbsp;(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), 209. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-7'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-8'>Crimp, 211. Crimp notes as well that Bush asked Johnson to join his National Commission on AIDS, although the administration\u2019s continued resistance to increased funding for the commission would lead Johnson to step down rather quickly in September 1992. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-8'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-9'>Douglas Crimp, \u201cPortraits of People with AIDS,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Cultural Studies<\/em>, ed. Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula A. Treichler (New York: Routledge, 1992), 118. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-9'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-10'>Ibid., 118\u201319. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-10'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-11'>Ibid., 120. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-11'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-12'>Ibid. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-12'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-13'>The logo came from a 1987 poster made by the six members of the SILENCE\u2009=\u2009DEATH Project: Avram Finkelstein, Brian Howard, Oliver Johnston, Charles Kreloff, Chris Lione, and Jorge Socarr\u00e1s. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-13'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-14'>Douglas Crimp, \u201cAIDS: Cultural Analysis\/Cultural Activism,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;43 (Winter, 1987): 12. Susan Sontag would also discuss the rhetorical aspects of AIDS and ways of deconstructing it as a cultural text; see her&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Its Metaphors<\/em>&nbsp;(New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1989). <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-14'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-15'>Gregg Bordowitz, \u201cPicture a Coalition,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;43 (Winter 1987): 184. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-15'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-16'>Crimp, \u201cAIDS: Cultural Analysis\/Cultural Activism,\u201d 14. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-16'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-17'>Simon Watney, \u201cThe Spectacle of AIDS,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;43 (Winter 1987): 78. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-17'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-18'>Between 1995 and 1999, Blanchon would teach at five institutions: California Institute of the Arts (1995\u201397), University of California, Irvine (1995\u201397), ArtCenter College of Design (1996), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1998), and the School of the Art Institute of Chicago (1998\u201399). For a full biography of Blanchon\u2019s activities, see \u201cBiography,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Robert Blanchon<\/em>, ed. Duvergne and Sadao, 171\u201374. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-18'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-19'>Johnstone,&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Representation<\/em>, 111. For the article assigned by Blanchon, see Sherrie Levine, \u201cFive Comments,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Blasted Allegories: An Anthology of Writings by Contemporary Artists<\/em>, ed. Brian Wallis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987), 92\u201393. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-19'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-20'>Crimp, \u201cPictures,\u201d 87. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-20'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-21'>Benjamin H. D. Buchloh, \u201cAllegorical Procedures: Appropriation and Montage in Contemporary Art,\u201d&nbsp;<em>Artforum<\/em>&nbsp;21, no. 1 (September 1982): 52. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-21'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-22'>Crimp, \u201cPortraits,\u201d 126. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-22'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-23'>Buchloh, \u201cAllegorical Procedures,\u201d 52. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-23'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-24'> Ibid. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-24'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-25'>Benjamin H. D. Buchloh, \u201cFigures of Authority, Ciphers of Regression: Notes on the Return of Representation in European Painting,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;16 (Spring 1981): 66. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-25'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-26'>Crimp, \u201cPortraits,\u201d 118. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-26'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-27'>In addition to the critics associated with the Pictures Generation, Johnstone makes a convincing claim for considering the debate about AIDS representations\u2014especially the photographs of Nixon and Fox Solomon\u2014in relation to so-called anti-photography theorists from the 1970s and 1980s like Susan Sontag, Allan Sekula, and Martha Rosler who deconstructed the power dynamics embedded within neutral, objective documentary practices that also exhibited a \u201cliberal\u201d belief in representation. See Johnstone\u2019s chapter on Nixon and Fox Solomon, \u201cPutting a Face to AIDS: Critiquing Documentary Portrait Photography,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Representation<\/em>, 49\u201371. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-27'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-28'>Robert Blanchon, \u201c[never realized <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-28'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-29'>Johnstone,&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Representation<\/em>, 111. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-29'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-30'>Sasha Archibald, \u201cRobert Blanchon\u2019s Archive of Absence,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Robert Blanchon<\/em>, ed. Duvergne and Sadao, 30. Johnstone describes the work similarly, writing that Blanchon \u201chints at the scale of the AIDS epidemic as a collective tragedy as well as a personal one\u201d; see&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Representation<\/em>, 125. As her focus is the question of portraiture in Blanchon\u2019s and other artists\u2019 practices, she goes on to argue that surrogate objects and heteroglossia aid him in bypassing the individualizing logics of self-depiction: \u201cHis refusal to represent the body directly has a similar effect, liberating the work from the individualizing limitations of the purely self-referential and bestowing upon it social and political significance as an investigation into the social and psychical construction of the gay male subject at this critical historical moment\u201d (126\u201327). <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-30'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-31'>Johnstone,&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Representation<\/em>, 108. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-31'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-32'>Craig Owens, \u201cThe Medusa Effect, or, The Specular Ruse,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Beyond Recognition: Representation, Power, and Culture<\/em>, ed. Scott Bryson, Barbara Kruger, Lynne Tillman, and Jane Weinstock (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), 192. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-32'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-33'>Mark Schoofs, \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/chicagoreader.com\/news-politics\/politics-gays-and-daley\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Gays and Daley<\/a>,\u201d&nbsp;<em>Chicago Reader<\/em>, November 16, 1989, accessed December 3, 2020 <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-33'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-34'>Richard Meyer, \u201cThe Jesse Helms Theory of Art,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;104 (Spring 2003): 138. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-34'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-35'>It is reported that John Darmour helped Blanchon hang the posters around the city. See \u201cCatalogue,\u201d 131. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-35'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-36'>Josh Gamson, \u201cSilence, Death and the Invisible Enemy: AIDS Activism and Social Movement \u2018Newness,\u2019\u201d&nbsp;<em>Social Problems<\/em>&nbsp;36, no. 4 (October 1989): 352. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-36'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-37'>Here I refer to the title of Bordowitz\u2019s article cited in note 15: \u201cPicture a Coalition.\u201d <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-37'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-38'>Here I refer to the following catalogs:&nbsp;<em>Robert Blanchon<\/em>, ed. Duvergne and Sadao; and&nbsp;<em>You Make Me Feel [Mighty Real <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-38'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-39'>As Alexander Alberro and others have demonstrated, however, Conceptualism did not succeed in avoiding the commodity form. In fact, as Alberro argues, Conceptualism\u2019s turn to information as its primary aesthetic content fed directly into the \u201cinformation economy\u201d of the post-Fordist period. See his&nbsp;<em>Conceptual Art and the Politics of Publicity<\/em>&nbsp;(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004). <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-39'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-40'>See Alexander Alberro, \u201cThe Way out Is the Way in,\u201d introduction to&nbsp;<em>Art After Conceptual Art<\/em>, ed. Alberro and Sabeth Buchmann (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), 20. For LeWitt\u2019s quote about clerks, see his essay \u201cSerial Project No. 1 (ABCD),\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Sol LeWitt<\/em>&nbsp;(New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1978), 170. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-40'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-41'>Archibald, \u201cRobert Blanchon\u2019s Archive,\u201d 24\u201325. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-41'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-42'>James Yood, \u201cRobert Blanchon,\u201d&nbsp;<em>Artforum<\/em>&nbsp;39, no. 8 (April 2001): 142. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-42'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-43'>Dolores Boogdanian, \u201cHonoring Conceptualism: A Suspicious Perception,\u201d&nbsp;<em>Whitewalls<\/em>, no. 26 (Fall 1990): 27\u201331. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-43'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-44'>Alberro,&nbsp;<em>Conceptual Art<\/em>, 151. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-44'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-45'>\u201cDouglas Crimp with Jarrett Earnest,\u201d interview,&nbsp;<em>Brooklyn Rail<\/em>, October 2016, accessed November 24, 2020,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/brooklynrail.org\/2016\/10\/art\/douglas-crimp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/brooklynrail.org\/2016\/10\/art\/douglas-crimp<\/a>&nbsp;with-jarrett-earnest. The issue on queer representation was never published. It was based on a series of papers given at the conference \u201cHow Do I Look?,\u201d presented at Anthology Film Archives in New York. After Rosalind Krauss and Annette Michelson determined that two of the papers did not meet&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>\u2019s editorial standards, Crimp decided to publish the essays with Bay Press instead. For Crimp\u2019s account of the split in the pages of the journal, see his short text \u201cTo Our Readers,\u201d&nbsp;<em>October<\/em>&nbsp;53 (Summer 1990): 110\u201312. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-45'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-46'>\u201cHal Foster in Conversation with Aria Dean,\u201d&nbsp;<em>November<\/em>, December 11, 2020, accessed December 11, 2020,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/novembermag.com\/contents\/hal-foster\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/novembermag.com\/contents\/hal-foster<\/a>. Foster would later write about AIDS as one of many components that sparked this \u201creturn to the real\u201d in art of the late 1980s and 1990s: \u201c\u2026 despair about the persistent AIDS crisis, invasive disease and death, systemic poverty and crime, the destroyed welfare state, indeed the broken social contract (as the rich opt out in revolution from the top and the poor are dropped out in immiseration from the bottom). The articulation of these different forces is difficult, yet together they drive the contemporary concern with trauma and abjection.\u201d See his&nbsp;<em>The Return of the Real<\/em>&nbsp;(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), 166. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-46'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-47'>Johnstone,&nbsp;<em>AIDS and Representation<\/em>, 145\u201346. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-47'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-48'>\u201cCatalogue,\u201d 132. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-48'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-49'>Carroll, in Martin-Breen, \u201cInterview,\u201d 4. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-49'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-50'>Alberro,&nbsp;<em>Conceptual Art<\/em>, 131. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-50'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-51'>Carroll, in Martin-Breen, \u201cInterview,\u201d 4. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-51'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-52'>Foster,&nbsp;<em>Return of the Real<\/em>, 166. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-52'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-53'>Connie Samaras, \u201cI met Robert ten years ago to the date,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>lalalalalala lalalalalala lalalalalalalalalalala<\/em>&nbsp;(Los Angeles: Los Angeles Center for Photographic Studies, 1996), 19. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-53'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-54'>Watney, \u201cSpectacle of AIDS,\u201d 85. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-54'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-55'>Douglas Crimp, \u201cMourning and Militancy,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Melancholia and Moralism: Essays on AIDS and Queer Politics<\/em>&nbsp;(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), 139. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-55'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><li id='fn-18893-56'>Isabelle Graw, \u201cConceptual Expression: On Conceptual Gestures in Allegedly Expressive Painting, Traces of Expression in Proto-Conceptual Works, and the Significance of Artistic Procedures,\u201d in&nbsp;<em>Art After Conceptual Art<\/em>, 121. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-18893-56'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subjectivity, conceptual expression, and AIDS imagery in the work of Robert Blanchon<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":18910,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"kia_subtitle":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[8,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-from-art-journal","category-uncategorized",""],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18893\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18910"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/artjournal.collegeart.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}